viernes, 10 de mayo de 2013

Pecios



Ya me había dicho un cuñado que por aquel entonces tenía, unos cuantos años mayor que yo y bastante ilustrado por cierto, que "El País" era un periódico lamentable. Yo no lo veía así y pensaba que su pensamiento conservador le hacía equivocarse al respecto. Bien, hace ya bastantes años que empecé a pensar que quizá el que estaba equivocado era yo. Hoy día ya pienso sin ambages que "El País", efectivamente, es una verdadera porquería de periódico. La ambigüedad calculada con la que trata el asunto de los nacionalismos regionales me parece repugnante, lo mismo que su demagogia barata cuando trata el tema de los derechos sociales, por no hablar, ya, de su insistencia en la corrupción de la derechona que es que, entonces, da risa. 

Hoy, sin ir más lejos, abre su edición digital a bombo y platillo con los sobresueldos que el PP pagó a Aznar cuando fue elegido Presidente. Por supuesto la cifra la da en pesetas para que le puedan entender las porteras que seguramente es la clientela más fiel que le va quedando. En pesetas, claro, es fácil referirse a millones. ¡Con lo que eso asusta! Al final dice que fueron gastos de representación y no aclara si esos 16.000 € los cobraba cada mes o fue cosa de toda la legislatura. En definitiva, una noticia irrelevante a la que se pretende dar calado con el bombo y el platillo de la primera página. 16.000 €, madre mía, para el CEO de una gran corporación. Una verdadera ridiculez. Aunque, ahora que lo pienso, quizá los de "El País", cegados como deben de estar por el amor cósmico, no han caído en la cuenta de que un partido político como el PP es una gran corporación que paga a sus cuadros como le da la gana. 

No es que con todo esto quiera decir que los otros periódicos patrios sean mejores. Los hay incluso sedicentes. Sí, sedicentes digo y agradezco que así sea porque es un alivio conocer de antemano las intenciones de los que te quieren hacer mal. Luego, los hay entrañables, de los de para la gente bien de toda la vida, con una cierta calidad a pesar del toque retro y la inevitable previsibilidad. También, claro, no podía faltar el berlusconiano de turno, de los de "pel davant i pel darrera", o sea, para todos los gustos, es decir, para los desengañados. 

En fin, nada que no sepamos, pero es que lo que duele es sentirse defraudado por aquello en lo que un día confiaste. Cómo pudiste prestar tanta atención a una cosa tan necia, te recriminas. Bueno, ya se sabe que el defraudado tiende a exagerar cuando valora al presunto defraudador. De hecho, suelo hojear  "El País" lo mismo que cualquier otro y de vez en cuando pillo en él algún pecio valioso. En fin. 

Por cierto, hablando de pecios aquí les dejo uno que encontré en el Financial Times:

   
Smile if you’re European

By Simon Kuper
It’s all relative: why it’s not so bad to be European after all.
©Luis Grañena

Sometimes you really do need to smell the coffee. Arriving in Turin recently I made straight for the nearest bar and ordered a caffè macchiato. A charming woman served it up. I drank it standing at the counter. It was perfection. It cost €1. Then I had another. The bar was absolutely ordinary, with fading tablecloths and some pensioners doddering in the corner. Such a cheap moment of happiness, obtainable in its pure form only in Italy, gets you wondering: are things really so bad in Europe? Life here is better than you’d ever know from watching TV news.

Undeniably, many Europeans are suffering. Levels of unemployment are the highest since records began in France (3.2 million) and Spain (6 million). Bad European news mounts almost daily.
Europe is having a terrible time – except compared with probably every other continent and any time in history. Look at crisis-stricken Spain, for instance. The average Spaniard now lives to 82, seven years longer than in 1980. (Most countries where people can expect to reach 82 are European, says the World Health Organisation.) Today that average Spaniard’s income, despite years of crisis, is still nearly double what it was in 1980. And across Europe, daily life has tended to get gradually more pleasant. For instance, crime rates have kept falling in most western countries despite the crisis. British streets haven’t been this safe in more than 30 years, according to the UK’s Office of National Statistics.

It’s important to realise that most people’s lives aren’t affected by the latest twist in the eurozone crisis. A good new breast-cancer drug often does more for collective happiness than a good new prime minister. And those gains get shared out most fairly in Europe. That’s why seven of the 10 best-rating countries on the World Economic Forum’s gender gap index are European. So are six of the top 10 least corrupt in Transparency International’s corruption perception index. And when the CIA ranked 136 countries for income equality, the 17 most equal were all European. No wonder Spain and even Greece outrank Qatar on the United Nations’ human development index.

Most emerging economies lag decades behind us: Russian, Brazilian and Chinese average incomes are still below half those in Greece, according to the World Bank. Nonetheless, the relative rise of new countries engenders paranoia. The American pundit Thomas Friedman often says China and India are “eating our lunch”. But since the global economy isn’t a zero-sum game, it’s more accurate to say that the Chinese and Indians are making our lunch. The richer they get, the better they can afford our high-end engineering products, hotel rooms, luxury goods, universities, etc.

It’s also notable how well European democracies have held up under five years of crisis. In 1981, when shots were fired in Spain’s parliament, that average Spaniard still worried about a fascist coup. Today every western European country is a secure democracy. Contrary to predictions, Europe’s far right hasn’t risen en masse during the crisis, notes the London-based research and advisory group Counterpoint. Nor has western Europe experienced a big terrorist atrocity since 2005.

A decade ago, American pundits were predicting that anti-Semitism or vengeful Muslim immigrants or both would rip Europe apart. Indeed, in 2004, the American ambassador to the European Union, Rockwell Schnabel, said continental anti-Semitism was “getting to a point where it is as bad as it was in the 1930s”. That claim was always ludicrous, but its ludicrousness should now be plain even to Schnabel. In short: several dogs haven’t barked in Europe this crisis.

Crucially, too, the next round of wars shouldn’t involve Europeans. If Iran, North Korea or Taiwan blows up, we won’t be there. We just don’t have the gunboats any more. Last year Asian defence spending exceeded Europe’s probably for the first time since Europeans began conquering the world 500 years ago. Defence experts bewail our impotence. But on the bright side, governments with strong armies always overestimate their ability to manage a war smoothly, and get lured into horrible adventures. That won’t happen to us. Sure, the 400 million western Europeans – just 6 per cent of the global population – won’t rule the world again, but then we don’t particularly want to.

When even Serbia and Kosovo make peace, you know something remarkable is happening here. Perhaps the EU actually deserved its Nobel Peace Prize. And given our lack of natural resources, other countries will probably leave us in peace. Daniel Keohane, head of strategic affairs at Fride, the European think-tank on foreign policy, says: “No one would predict a war in Europe involving very large powers.” Europe, says Keohane, increasingly looks like “a very pleasant suburb of geopolitics”.

Our crisis won’t last for ever. Then it will be another continent’s turn to get caned by pundits for its stupid model. One day young Europeans will get jobs again, and we’ll just be a delightful backwater with excellent macchiato. I can think of several worse places to live.

simon.kuper@ft.com

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario